Platform

Lichess vs Chess.com: Which Is Better for Indonesian Players? (An Honest 2026 Comparison)

Lichess is completely free and open source; Chess.com has the most complete learning features but is paid. An honest Lichess vs Chess.com comparison covering rating, analysis, puzzles, courses, community, anti-cheating, and price in Rupiah — plus a local alternative worth considering.

11 September 2026 · ±13 min read · Katuranga

Lichess vs Chess.com: Which Is Better for Indonesian Players? (An Honest 2026 Comparison)

Every online chess player in Indonesia eventually faces the same question: Lichess or Chess.com? Both are giants, both have millions of players, and both have fanatical supporters ready to argue for hours. This article tries to answer it without fanaticism — from the point of view of an Indonesian player who wants to learn, play, and maybe doesn't want to spend hundreds of thousands of rupiah every month.

We compare nine things: business model, rating system, analysis quality, puzzles, learning material, community and tournaments, anti-cheating, mobile apps, and price. At the end there are recommendations by player type, and an honest section about where Katuranga stands between the two.

The most fundamental difference: who pays

Before getting into features, understand one difference that explains almost all the others.

Lichess is a non-profit organization. Its code is open source, there are no ads, no paid subscriptions, and every feature is free for everyone. Costs are covered by voluntary donations — "Patrons" only get a small wing badge next to their name, no extra features. Lichess is run by a small team and hundreds of volunteers.

Chess.com is a commercial company, and the biggest in the chess world. Some features are free, but the most valuable ones — unlimited analysis, unlimited puzzles, courses, videos — are locked behind Gold, Platinum, or Diamond subscriptions. Chess.com employs hundreds of people, produces content at large scale, and runs tournaments with millions of dollars in prizes.

There's nothing wrong with either model. But it explains why Lichess feels "clean but simple" and Chess.com feels "complete but always offering an upgrade".

1. Rating system: why the numbers differ

The most common question: "My rating on Lichess is 1600 but on Chess.com it's only 1250. Which one is right?"

Both are right — for their own populations. Lichess uses Glicko-2 with a starting rating of 1500; Chess.com also uses Glicko-2 but with a lower starting rating and a different population. As a result, Lichess ratings are generally 200–400 points higher than Chess.com for the same player, especially at fast time controls.

Estimated bar chart: Lichess ratings 200–400 points higher than Chess.com for the same player at three skill levels
An estimated illustration, not a formula: the same player usually gets a higher number on Lichess. What differs is the population, not the skill.

A few practical notes:

A complete guide to how rating works and how to raise it is in how to improve your Elo rating.

2. Game analysis: free on one, limited on the other

This is the biggest differentiator for players who are serious about learning.

Lichess: unlimited, free Stockfish analysis for every game, complete with an evaluation graph, move classification (inaccuracy, mistake, blunder), and a "Learn from your mistakes" feature that asks you to find the better move yourself. You can also run the engine in your browser as deep as you like, anytime.

Chess.com: "Game Review" with human-language coaching ("This is a good move because…"), finer classifications (including Brilliant and Great), and an easy-to-understand accuracy number. But for free accounts, Game Review is limited to one game per day; the rest require a subscription.

Italian Game middlegame position being analysed, with an arrow showing the bishop's plan toward g5
Positions like this — a middlegame with several reasonable plans — are where analysis is most useful. What separates the platforms isn't the engine (all use Stockfish), but how the results are explained.

An honest assessment: the engine behind both is the same (Stockfish). The difference is in presentation. Chess.com is friendlier to beginners with its explanations; Lichess is more honest and unlimited but expects you to understand evaluation numbers yourself. For players who review more than one game a day without wanting to pay, Lichess wins decisively.

3. Puzzles: quantity vs curation

Lichess has more than three million puzzles generated automatically from real games, all free and unlimited. There's Puzzle Streak, Puzzle Storm (how many in 3 minutes), Puzzle Racer (racing other people), and themed puzzles (forks, pins, mate in 2, and so on) that can be filtered.

Chess.com has more curated puzzles, Puzzle Rush (similar to Storm), and Puzzle Battle. The average quality per puzzle is slightly better thanks to human curation, but free accounts are limited to a few puzzles per day.

For players who want a routine of 10 puzzles a day as suggested in our rating guide, the free Chess.com daily limit becomes a real problem. Lichess doesn't have that problem.

4. Learning material: here Chess.com is far ahead

If you want structured courses, video lessons, and explanations from grandmasters, Chess.com has no equal. Thousands of lessons from openings to endgames, videos from top players, and learning paths arranged by level. All of it, again, mostly behind a subscription.

Lichess has a "Learn" section with basic exercises (piece movement, coordinates, basic tactics), "Practice" for endgames and tactics, plus thousands of user-made Studies — some very good, many half-finished. There's no complete official curriculum.

For Indonesian players, both have one big drawback: almost all the material is in English. Lichess's interface has been translated into Indonesian by volunteers, but the lesson content hasn't. Chess.com has some translated articles, but its courses and videos are in English.

5. Community, tournaments, and streamers

Chess.com is the center of the online chess world. Big tournaments (Speed Chess Championship, Titled Tuesday), almost all the major streamers, official clubs, and integration with FIDE championships. If you want to watch chess, Chess.com is the place.

Lichess has arena tournaments every hour, free, often joined by titled players. Its community is smaller but very active, especially among players who value open source. Lichess tournaments feel more like "competition between players", Chess.com tournaments more like "a show".

For Indonesian players, Indonesian chess clubs exist on both platforms, and local community tournaments tend to be held on Lichess because it's free and easy to set up.

6. Anti-cheating

Both are serious, with different approaches.

Chess.com uses large-scale statistical detection and closes hundreds of thousands of accounts a year, including some titled players — the cases often make the news. The system is closed (nobody knows exactly how it works).

Lichess also uses automatic detection plus user reports, and marks cheating accounts with a publicly visible label. Its system is more transparent because part of its code is open.

A reality to accept on both platforms: below 1500, you will meet players who occasionally use an engine. It can't be completely avoided on any free platform. What you can do: report, don't tilt, and remember that your long-term rating isn't affected by one or two games against a cheater.

7. Mobile apps

Chess.com has a bigger, more complete app (puzzles, lessons, videos, character bots), but it's also heavier, sends more notifications, and is full of upgrade offers.

Lichess has a light, fast, ad-free app that works almost the same as the web version. On phones with little memory and Indonesian connections that aren't always stable, Lichess feels far more comfortable.

One note: neither app yet offers a complete offline engine for playing bots without a signal — Chess.com has limited offline bots, Lichess needs a connection. That's a gap filled by local apps like Katuranga, which bundles Stockfish inside the app so you can play without internet.

8. Price in Rupiah

Lichess: Rp0. Forever, for every feature. Voluntary donations.

Chess.com: subscription prices vary by region and promotion, but for Indonesia the range is about Rp80,000–Rp200,000 per month depending on tier (Gold, Platinum, Diamond), or cheaper if paid yearly. For students and casual players, that's not a small amount — equal to a month's mobile data plan or more.

The question to ask honestly: which paid features do you actually use? If the answer is "unlimited analysis and puzzles", Lichess gives both for free. If the answer is "structured video courses from GMs", Chess.com is worth paying for.

9. Features found on only one platform

Some distinctive features that might decide your choice:

Only on Lichess:
- A very powerful board editor and Studies for creating your own material — many Indonesian chess coaches use this.
- A full set of chess variants: Chess960, Crazyhouse, Atomic, Antichess, King of the Hill, and more.
- Live tournament broadcasts that anyone can create.
- Unlimited PGN export, and an open API for developers.

Only on Chess.com:
- Character bots (from beginner up to an engine "Magnus") that are fun to practice against.
- Brilliant/Great classifications in Game Review — covered in depth in what is a brilliant move.
- Insights that summarize your strengths and weaknesses from hundreds of games.
- A content ecosystem: news, articles, videos, streamers — all in one place.

10. The everyday playing experience: matchmaking, board, and connection

There are small things that don't make it into comparison tables but are felt every day.

Finding an opponent. On both platforms, 10+0 rapid players usually get an opponent within seconds. The difference shows in less popular time controls (for example 15+10 or 30+0 classical): Chess.com has more players so matchmaking is faster, while on Lichess you sometimes wait half a minute during Indonesia's quiet hours (WIB mornings, when Europe and America are asleep).

Board and pieces. Lichess is known for its clean, fast board that can be customized in detail — including chained premoves and responsive piece-movement settings. Chess.com has more visual themes and sound effects, but its interface is busier. For blitz and bullet players, many feel Lichess is a bit lighter in the hand.

Connection and lag. Both servers are outside Indonesia, so there's a delay (lag) of a few dozen milliseconds that isn't noticeable in rapid but is in bullet. Both compensate for lag automatically. More importantly: the Lichess app handles dropped connections more gracefully — if your signal disappears for three seconds, your game is usually still there when it comes back.

Distractions. Free Chess.com shows ads and upgrade offers in many places; Lichess shows nothing but the board. This seems trivial at first, but after hundreds of games, that calm screen is noticeable.

11. Switching platforms: can ratings and games come with you?

Ratings can't be transferred — you start over on the new platform, and that's reasonable since the populations differ. But your games can come with you. Both support PGN export: Lichess lets you download your entire game archive in one file, Chess.com per game or per month. That PGN file can be uploaded to any platform for analysis — including Katuranga's Analysis.

Practical advice if you decide to switch or use both:

Recommendations by player type

To keep it practical, here are direct answers for a few Indonesian player profiles:

Where Katuranga stands

We won't pretend Katuranga is as big as either of them — it's much smaller, and built in Indonesia for Indonesian players. But there are a few things we designed precisely because they don't exist on Lichess or Chess.com:

If you're already comfortable on Lichess or Chess.com, there's no reason to switch. But if you want to learn in your own language, or want bots with no quota, try Katuranga — it's free to sign up, and you lose nothing if it turns out not to suit you.

A quick comparison table

For those who want to see everything at a glance:

Conclusion

Lichess vs Chess.com isn't a question of "which is better", but "which is better for you":

Many serious players end up using both: Lichess for practicing and reviewing games without limits, Chess.com for watching, following the news, and playing occasionally. No rule forbids it — and there's no rating you have to choose between.

Whatever the platform, it isn't the site that raises your rating. What raises your rating is reviewing your own games, working through tactics thoroughly, and mastering basic endgames — three things you can do on Lichess, on Chess.com, or on Katuranga, with the same results.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lichess really free?

Yes, completely. Lichess is a non-profit organization with open-source code; every feature, including Stockfish analysis and unlimited puzzles, is available at no cost and without ads. "Patron" donations only give a badge, not extra features.

Why is my rating higher on Lichess than on Chess.com?

Because the player populations and starting ratings are different. Lichess starts new players at 1500, so its whole scale shifts upward; for the same player, the Lichess rating is usually 200–400 points higher. Compare percentiles, not the numbers.

Which is better for beginners, Lichess or Chess.com?

For learning at no cost, Lichess, because analysis and puzzles aren't limited. For beginners who want human-language explanations and structured English courses, Chess.com is friendlier, but most of its features are paid.

Does Chess.com have a free version?

Yes. A free Chess.com account can play without limits, but Game Review is limited to one game per day, puzzles to a few per day, and most courses and videos are locked behind Gold, Platinum, or Diamond subscriptions.

Can I use Lichess and Chess.com at the same time?

Yes, and many serious players do: Lichess for practicing and reviewing games without limits, Chess.com for watching tournaments, following the news, and playing occasionally. Ratings on the two are separate and don't affect each other.

Try it on the board

Reading alone doesn't raise your rating. Play one game against a bot, then review it — Katuranga marks your brilliant moves, mistakes, and blunders with Stockfish.